November 3, 2013

In case you were not aware, 24,000 lawyers in NYC were found civilly guilty of conspiracy to commit or hide human trafficking and sex trafficking within trust funds.  To raise awareness, I have started this petition.   Each lawyer who was a member of the NYC Bar Association on September 20th, 2013 is to make a formal public statement asserting their guilt or innocence.

To add your name to this petition send an email to andrewbb@gmail.com.   Include a link to your website and I will add the link!

Signatures

Andrew Brown Landlord-free housing for single mothers

To all NYC Lawyers: JUDGMENT SETTLEMENT INSTRUCTIONS

November 3, 2013

As evidenced in the Judgment detailed below, each NYC Bar Association member has been ordered to pay $4,000 + $320 interest.

Possible settlement statements:

  • “In exchange for fair and valuable consideration, settlement has been reached.”
  • “I am innocent of all allegations and consideration has been conveyed.”
  • Or write your own mission statement.

For settlement instructions send an email to andrewbb@gmail.com

Status

November 3, 2013

No response from Defendants. I have forwarded to FBI, Attorney Generals of various states, media of all types (radio, TV, newspapers), including several lawyers in NYC in person, on the phone, email, and written notes. No response as yet. They are in psychological denial.

Since civil guilt of Sex-Trafficking can be used as evidence for criminal guilt, they could all be charged with “Criminal Conspiracy to” convey humans as property or something and thrown in prison.

Also see http://keihatsu.blogspot.com for relevant information, including a letter to President Obama some legal thoughts and what I term Physical/Public Torture Cubes (PTCs for short).

Default, Judgment, Initiating Complaint, and email discussions

November 3, 2013

NOTICE OF DEFAULT

 
 

Plaintiff/Creditor: Andrew Bransford Brown

1218 Hoe Avenue, #331

Bronx, New York 10459

(347) 360-2267

 

Defendant/Debtor: The Association of the Bar of the City of New York

(all living beings on the membership roster as of September 20th, 2013)

 
 

A Judgment was declared against the Defendant/Debtor on September 24, 2013. Notice of this Judgment was delivered to 42 W 44th Street at 12:45pm on the same day. It is currently past due and an 8% penalty has been applied to the initial amount.

 

Judgment amount: $4,000.00 (each member of The Association of the Bar of the City of New York)

plus 8%: 320.00

 

Total Due: $4,320.00 (each member of said association)

 

Additional penalties and interest will apply if this is not paid before October 14, 2013.

 

Note: As the allegations in the initiating lawsuit have not been disputed, guilt is assumed.

 

I would settle this matter civilly before some jurisdiction in the US decides to use the civil ruling as evidence in a criminal trial.

 

Sincerely,

Andrew Bransford Brown

andrewbb@gmail.com

 

For a copy of the initiating complaint and judgment, please see:http://abbVsNycBar.blogspot.com

A “Quick Links” summary has been provided.

 

FYI, cash payment in person is highly preferred at this time and might allow negotiations in both judgment and amount. Text me for time and place would work too. I am usually in midtown Manhattan.

 
 
 

NOTICE OF JUDGMENT

 

9/24/2013

Handwritten note delivered to 42 W 44th Street at 11:45am by me, Andrew Bransford Brown:

RE: Andrew Bransford Brown vs. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

To Whom it May Concern:

I, Andrew Bransford Brown, have determined the following:
1. the lawyers refuse to defend themselves.
2. they must be guilty or protecting the guilty (or they would counter with libel or slander).
3. The verdict is GUILTY (acting Judge is me due to “no contest” in negotiations).
4. SENTENCE/DAMAGES are $4,000.00 each. All licensed lawyers. Students excepted.
5. I am open to settlement of lesser amounts if aggregated or preventing me from the hassle of filing a lien on personal property or real estate.
6. I hereby request a membership roster in both digital & paper format to assist in collections. Failure to comply with this request may result in additional collection fees on top of the $4,000.00 each. Email addresses, names, and physical addresses at a minimum. Phone #’s also.

The pain and suffering of filing 25,000 liens might be substantial.

Andrew Bransford Brown

 
 
 

INITIATING LAWSUIT

Supreme Court, Civil Branch, New York County

New York County Courthouse

60 Centre Street

New York, N.Y. 10007

 

Andrew Bransford Brown, an individual,

 

Plaintiff

 

vs.

 

The Association of the Bar of the City of New York,

(unknown legal structure,

perhaps contractual organized within New York City)

 

Defendant

 
 

Plaintiff, Andrew Bransford Brown, allege as follows:

 

On or about January 25, 1967 I had a trust fund whose custody was assumed by the legal organizational structure in the United States of America to include the Federal Government and all legal professionals in practice at that time. It is unknown whose custody it was placed under, however, a legal professional or professionals must have known of its existence and paperwork is hidden or buried (or destroyed) to prevent me from discovering its existence.

 

Since the time of my birth (January 25, 1967), in my search for my natural parents I discovered extraordinary circumstantial evidence that can be explained in no other way than one or more lawyers formed a conspiracy and failed to deliver paperwork informing me of my trust fund on or about my 18th birthday.

 

Background on Trust funds: Large, old-wealth trust funds frequently included arranged marriages or brides. While some see the monetary value in stealing the trust, others see the opportunity to avail themselves to the 100,000,000 women who were in my trust fund.

 

I assert the legal community at large was coerced or tempted into the rights of first perusal of those women which grew so large as to include the Federal Government and military. Some background understanding, Hiroshima and Nagasaki during WWII were bombed with nuclear weapons to threaten Japanese royalty into delivering their princesses according to trust funds that probably led to the trust fund in my father’s name. Those princesses were delivered to military personnel in the United States and never reached my father.

 

In my research, I located my natural mother, Kay Hudson Fiset (Hudson maiden name) inSyracuse, NY. Her father was Keith Hudson (Thousand Oaks, California resident). She and his Japanese wife were co-trustees on his estate. It was put into probate and I have not seen the documents. He died at the age of 97 or 98 about 2 years ago. My estimation is that trust will provide clues to my paternal trust.

 

As the de-facto bar association of the City of New York, the Defendant has a fiduciary obligation to the public at large to maintain ethics and standards of its members. It is my estimation that one or more lawyers in said association have factual knowledge of some or all of the above.

 
 

Parties

 

Andrew Bransford Brown, an individual born in Honolulu, Hawaii on January 25, 1967 and currently residing at 1218 Hoe Avenue #331, Bronx, NY 10459 (a homeless shelter). Andrew was adopted at 6 days old by Colonel Joseph Brown III (MD) and his blind wife Suzanne Hoskins Brown of Charlottesville, VA (currently residing in Atlanta, GA). Apparent natural mother is Kay Hudson Fiset of Charlottesville, VA (currently residing in Syracuse, NY). Note: it is possible Kay Hudson Fiset was a surrogate in an ovum donation. My intuition and experience indicates either a Ford or Hilton was the ovum donor in 1966, however, I have no tangible proof of that. (Plaintiff)

 

The Association of the Bar of the City of New York, a voluntary association of lawyers and students with unknown legal structure, apparently organized under the laws of New York City. The association headquarters is located at 42 West 44th Street, New York, NY 10036. (Defendant)

 
 
 

Factual Background

 

My current situation is I have been forced into poverty and am living in a homeless shelter at 1218 Hoe Avenue, Bronx, NY 10459.

 

My assets are $0, my liabilities are< $5,000 in credit card and other debts.

 

My last job was a valet parking attendant at the Marriott in Times Square (Central Parking was the employer). I was fired from that job when I complained about being placed in a dingy garage running dispatch without break and without relief and without allowing time for dinner with no windows and running inventory on their computer for 8+ hours at a time. I also complained the tip pool at the Marriott desk was being raided and I was receiving $5-9 for each 8 hour shift. I was originally hired as a valet attendant who greeted customers and was fine in that job, but they forced me into a garage outside of public view. Note: I am blonde, blue eyes, tall and fit, well groomed and very presentable.

 

Prior to Central Parking, I was working at Genpact (on assignment to Morgan Stanley) as Morgan Stanley’s lead software architect for their wealth management CRM. I designed the architecture and authentication system that I termed “Fingerprint Touch”logon. Essentially it is an identity-theft proof way of authenticating a human being on their phone. I informed senior management of Genpact of the patentability of the technology. After no response, I hand-wrote a description of the technology along with some intellectual property law recommendations and requested a meeting with an IP lawyer and computer security personnel at Morgan Stanley to discuss its viability. At 6am approximately 3 months ago I distributed a copy of that handwritten note to every cubicle and office on the 10th floor at One New York Plaza on Water Street, NY. As all personnel on that floor had the same security clearance and the handwritten note never left the floor, I did not feel this was in any way a security breach. It was simply a memo to the team of my status on the project. I was scolded by Genpact human resources and a day later received a call from the sales guy (not my boss) while he was in London who fired me on the phone. Two days later I was forcibly evicted from my quasi-legal sublet on 42nd street between 9th and 10thavenues. (a very nice concierge-type luxury building.)

 

I have heard through the grapevine, but do not have tangible evidence that my allowance was set to $0 about 6 years ago. Prior to that, my allowance had been $100,000 per year, however, I had to work for that allowance because the thieves who stole my trust fund did not want me to learn of its existence.

 

What can I prove?

 

1. Extreme competence at a world-class level in nearly any field of endeavor or subject-matter to include physics, monetary science, psychology, philosophy, linguistics, mathematics, accounting, and computer science and software development and databases and security.

2. Total income of much less than $100,000 per year despite the above competencies with proof of extraordinary efforts and successes beyond measure.

3. An unexplained “silent treatment” from American females (no dates or conversations or eye contact from girlfriend or marriage-quality females in my 46 years of life).

4. An unexplained “silent treatment” from the Federal government, including the White House, CIA, military branches, Congress, and various Federal offices. I can provide an email and fax trail that is unexplainable to any reasonable person of why there was no response.

5. An unexplained “silent treatment” and attack from the IRS that resulted in a fraudulent tax lien filed in Maricopa County without a property address (I never owned property in Maricopa County, so how can they file a tax lien on potential property ownership?). Further, the tax lien was a result of a fraudulent 1099 where the IRS asserted gross amount as income and refused to consider cost basis of stock purchases, although brokerage statements were provided via fax and certified mail to multiple IRS offices around the country.

 

What do I want?

 

A copy of my trust fund document as a historical document for my family records. As the trust fund has been depleted in its entirety, I would simply like to know what happened.

 

The personal assets of the lawyers who did this to me and for them to be publicly and civilly stripped of all assets and personal contacts and acquaintances and placed into either a permanent homeless shelter with no cash or assets (food and water only) OR a public physical torture cube, depending on the civil or criminal proof that is discovered.

 

Due to my extreme poverty I request an expedited proceeding. The soup kitchen food and living amongst homeless is highly debilitating. My formerly nice clothes are taking a toll when following homeless people in the laundry.

 
 

I would like to request a small stipend/allowance while the suit is underway so I can afford to do laundry and buy some laundry detergent and I would also like to sit quietly in a bar this weekend and have a beer or two and buy some Backwoods smokes. Perhaps I might be allowed food outside the soup kitchen. An allowance of $1,500/month while the suit is underway is requested. I might also have printing, postage, and recording fees to pay that I cannot afford at this time.

 

Also see http://deadbeatlawyers.blogspot.com for copy of the same.

 
 

EMAIL TRAIL

 

PROCEDURAL vs. LEGAL

from:

Andrew Brown <andrewbb@gmail.com>

to:

“mcilenti@nycbar.org” <mcilenti@nycbar.org>,
“sglazer@nycbar.org” <sglazer@nycbar.org>,
“lkelly@nycbar.org” <lkelly@nycbar.org>,
“ghsu-luk@nycbar.org” <ghsu-luk@nycbar.org>,
Eileen Travis <etravis@nycbar.org>,
“lrs@nycbar.org” <lrs@nycbar.org>,
“clesuggestions@nycbar.org” <clesuggestions@nycbar.org>,
“crosenbaum@nycbar.org” <crosenbaum@nycbar.org>,
“mowens@nycbar.org” <mowens@nycbar.org>,
“aroytberg@nycbar.org” <aroytberg@nycbar.org>,
Arlene Bein <abein@nycbar.org>,
“cwaggoner@nycbar.org” <cwaggoner@nycbar.org>,
“cdunne@nycbar.org” <cdunne@nycbar.org>,
“arothstein@nycbar.org” <arothstein@nycbar.org>

date:

Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 2:37 PM

subject:

Procedure vs. Legal

mailed-by:

gmail.com

 

FYI,

 

The purpose of this summons to a meeting is simply to begin discussions on:

 

1. venue

2. judiciary

3. representation

 

Hardly is your procedural allotment of 20-30 days required. Potential answers to the above questions:

 

1. a public park, the steps of the Mid-Manhattan Libary, a local law school trail room

2. a 2nd or 3rd year law student or students, the media, any person of sound mind

3. due the certain guilt of certain members of your organization, I recommend the client/attorney secrecy be maintained by the hopefully few and a 2nd or 3rd year law student might not be guilty of anything and can adequately represent your organization in all proceedings.

 

Sincerely,

Andrew Bransford Brown

917 653 7781

 
 

Legal issues for you to review prior to our next meeting will be:

 

- your organizational structure in 1870 (I think it was 1870). Your organization was created in response to rampant judicial corruption.

- 14th Amendment

- 1913 creation of the Federal Reserve

- slavery and female suffrage/ownership

- constitutional law vs. contractual law

 

My background in the above subjects include:

- 2 years of Latin

- 12 years of monetary science self-study

- 7 months off Title 26 study (average 10 hours per day)

 

Note, the above background is non-inclusive and includes history of the relevant times.

 

An INTJ (if you know what that refers to), would not be able to keep up, but would be doing most of the talking.

 
 

To avoid ambiguity. An email does not constitute a “meeting” although is sufficent for notice and summons to such.

 
 
 

Imagine a question coming up during sentencing/damages discussion in front of a jury:

 

“Did the defendant really require 20-30 days to locate one lawyer amongst 24,000 who wasn’t busy to simply talk about venue, potential judge(s), and appropriate representation? Those items were not necessarily to be decided during the initial meeting nor was any discovery or research required. The purpose of the meeting was simply to begin a discussion on the parameters of such.” Further, where was the plaintiff during these 20-30 days while the defendants sat and drank cognac (as they mock laugh at the audacity!)? Oh. He was sitting in a homeless shelter, wandering around the city, eating in a soup kitchen. So… back to the damages/sentencing discussions.

 
 

As the attorney for the defense, might I remind the defendants, that Andrew Bransford Brown is a well-dressed, well-groomed, blonde, blue-eyed, 6’, 175 lb male who might pass for Prince William’s cousin in body language, appearance, manner, and education. IE. he is of higher class and distinction than most any of the defendants.

 

A juror thinks to themself: “so these guys were sitting around in veritable castles, throwing parties, and banging all these girls the whole time!!!???” And ignored the obviousness that Andrew Bransford Brown is a prince or something and they shoved him in a homeless shelter (just like they made ME poor my whole life!) My GOD, Andrew Bransford Brown solved physics and energy and monetary science and how to clean the world of pollution! This world could have been wonderful place!!! Those goddamned lawyers are going to PAY.”

 
 
 

As the arguments ensue inside the defendants’ minds… well, we ignore him… make sure he doesn’t get to the media… we’ll buy off the population with the last remaining hot chicks… what are we going to do? hire a killer or something! one says. the other is arrogantly confident and believes the military’s mind molestation equipment will save the day. We must BUY TIME! another says. How do we delay and impede? What can we do? “Silent treatment”.

 

BUT, a wise one interrupts! His emails are part of the record!

 
 
 

Logic dictates: The membership of The Association of the Bar of the City of New York must be informed of the suit!

 
 
 

Andrew is homeless! reminds one of the lawyers. He has all DAY!

 

He is going to walk that suit to every lawyer’s office in Manhattan!

 

He has nothing to do! He is well dressed. He does NOT LOOK homeless. He can get into buildings and pass security. He looks RICH! I did not know that. Yes, Bret forgot to mention that he looks like he’d be a member of my country club!

 
 

NO!!! That cannot be the CASE! He is HOMELESS!!!

 

Might I remind you, counselor, one of his recent positions was at Genpact/Morgan Stanley as their lead software architect. He is not your average homeless.

 
 
 
 

Is Andrew insane? NO.

 

Andrew is simply highly intelligent, highly educated, and very good at looking at other people’s perspectives. I am also highly amusing. And currently bored.

 

I am a trust fund victim whose parents went on vacation for years at a time while I wandered around empty mansions my whole life and the population ignored me because they were jealous of my wealth. So I have learned to amuse myself.

 

Is this a story? NO.

 

Is this a script? NO.

 

Is this a publicity stunt? NO.

 

Is this a joke? NO.

 

This is VERY REAL. I simply know how to keep things civil and mildly amusing while fully aware of the seriousness of the matter.

 
 
 
 

Oh… for the lawyers on the “letter of the law”, the sentence:

 

“I am a trust fund victim whose parents went on vacation for years at a time while I wandered around empty mansions my whole life and the population ignored me because they were jealous of my wealth.”

 

should have read

 

“I am [similar to] a trust fund victim whose parents went on vacation for years at a time while I wandered around empty mansions my whole life and the population ignored me because they were jealous of my wealth.”

 
 
 
 

From Alan Rothstein, in response to the above series of emails on Sep 23, 2013:

We have received your emails including the complaint you sent. We believe the case is without merit and we will respond accordingly to any legal action through the court process. We will not be providing you with any funds, as you call for in your email. We do not intend to communicate with yououtside of the process established by the courts and we ask you not to contact any of our staff goingforward.

Andrew Bransford Brown to nycbar.org list as above (including Alan Rothstein) on Sep 23, 2013:

Because the court’s officers are DEFENDANTS in this lawsuit, that is not good venue.

 

As for the “case is without merit” phrase: I would expect nothing other from the defendant to say, “not guilty”.

 
 

I began receiving, “Mail Delivery”problems as the emails were rejected one by one.

 

Last email before receiving Mail Delivery problem from Alan Rothstein.This email was sent from Andrew Bransford Brown:

Thinking of this further, I will need to know your list of suggested representatives. As General Counsel, you are the initiating contact, however, it is not your job to represent your organization in this suit.

 
 
 

Andrew Bransford Brown continues sending while the organization blocks each email address one by one:

 

As I said earlier, I set sufficient time for you to locate representation (a representative) from your organization to begin discussions on venue for these proceedings.

 

Who shall I speak with from your organization going further?

 

I will remind General Counsel, the choice of representation is a point of discussion and must be agreed to by BOTH parties of the suit.

 
 
 
 

Alan,

 

I do not wish to go to the sheriff or precinct tomorrow or to figure out how to have them issue a “FAILURE TO APPEAR” notice or warrant. I am in my legal and lawful right to do EXACTLY what I am doing.

 

You are NOT to argue the merits of the case. You are NOT the attorney on this case. You are the General Counsel for the organization who is refusing to acknowledge or respond to my civil request to speak with an appointed representative. As you seem to view this lawsuit as frivolous, I am asking for a list of suggestions since your judgement appears to be clouded.

 
 
 
 

Also, I will remind the defendants, that The Association of the Bar of the City of New York is an “association”. An “association” is a group of corporeal beings. It is not a piece of paper. It is not a sue-able entity. So I suggest to General Counsel that all members of your association be noticed and informed of the lawsuit.

 

I do not wish to do so one at a time.

 
 
 
 
 

FYI, I have not looked up the legal on this, however in layman’s language:

 

The Constitution is a non-contractual obligation to the public at large. The foundations of such are based on the Oath, general agreement on the spirit and letter of the Constitutional document and must be maintained by the reputation and actions of its members. The Constitutional obligation is to the public. In a similar way, your Association is composed of members with the ostensible obligation and implied promise (fiduciary responsibility) to maintain law. If the actions of its members do not live up to their reputations, the Association is a fraud.

 

Within the dues agreement there will be language to the above. Also, to the layman, the term “bar association” or “member of the bar” is of high standing. To maintain the image and reputation of the association, an internal clean-up must ensue. That could take years.

 

I reiterate my request for a small stipend while this very LONG lawsuit ensues. This will likely take years.

 

Sincerely,

Andrew Bransford Brown

 

PS. In the meantime, many of your lawyers are going to get very rich.

 
 
 
 
 

Yes Alan,

 

You will have to change your image of me. To reduce your arrogance, please see me as having a JD/MBA from Columbia or Brown with 15 years of experience in legal and business battles.

 

This should not be a battle between your organization and me. This is an amicable suit. Please do not force me to have you arrested for FAILURE TO APPEAR. Note: the failure to appear notice will be served to you personally, because apparently you are not going to delegate the task.

 

I do request a representative from your association who is less argumentative, however, I am more than capable of annoyingly handling arrogant lawyers like you.

 
 
 
 
 
 

To fast forward for you:

 

I assert that I am likely the rightful heir to the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve is a private corporation that was given a monopoly to print money and make a market for Treasury bonds by an act signed into law in 1913.

 

That might explain my true target. Stop seeing yourself as my enemy or me as yours.

 

FYI, I know how to fix that central bank.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Essentially, the lawsuit from your personal perspective is finding me a referral within your association to represent me in battles outside your organization while a wealth management trust issue is resolved via my lawsuit on your organization. Complex sentence there, but I think you get the gist.

 
 
 
 
 

The boundary between civil and criminal….

Failure to respond to a summons results in a civil trial becoming a criminal trail.

 

Please see one of my clauses in the “What do I want?” section. I am reattaching the suit, just in case you threw it in the trash bin as a joke.

 

Inclusions:Passport and Initiating lawsuit.

 

LEGALLY CRITICAL

The US does not support ownership of human beings as property. However, other jurisdictions DO. Trust funds sometimes arrange wives or girlfriends or dates. So trust fund enforcement of people-trafficking in the US is illegal. However, delivery of other property is not illegal.

 

Sincerely,

Andrew Bransford Brown

917 653 7781

andrewbb@gmail.com

1218 Hoe Avenue, #331

Bronx, NY, 10459

(currently homeless due to the above legal issue)

 
 
 

FYI

Apparently your “ethics@nycbar.org” email address is no longer operational. It apparently WAS operational earlier today and Friday.

 

Not sure what technical difficulty your organization might be having.

 
 

Andrew Bransford Brown vs. All Lawyers in NYC

As all lawyers in NYC are DEFENDANTS in this suit, the existing venue known as the County Courthouse is neither fair nor impartial. All the Judges are DEFENDANTS!

 

So, I suggest we arrange a time and place to discuss venue, representation, and fair and impartial “judge”. I surmise that is what is termed a SUMMONS in legal parlance.

 

Barring a phone call from your organization’s membership roster to arrange an earlier time and place today, might I suggest the LATEST time for this meeting today to occur at 1218 Hoe Avenue at 9pm (in front of the building, outside on the sidewalk). My curfew is at 10pm, so the meeting will be limited to 1 hour.

 

Sincerely,

Andrew Bransford Brown

917 653 7781

 
 

Legal advice for the defense.RE: Andrew Bransford Brown vs. all lawyers in NYC

 

aka The Association of the Bar of the City of New York:

 

If you personally are unable to respond to the summons, might I suggest informing your entire membership roster of the lawsuit?

 
 
 

I do not know local procedure in NYC yet. I will look it up. I will be informing your local precinct of the possibility of your refusal to respond to the summons.

 

“Failure to appear”.

 
 
 

Serious recommendations for the defense:

 

This suit is actually VERY good for the reputation of both your organization AND its members.

 

Remedying my situation with a paltry $1,500/month while the lawsuit continues and is publicized is a bargain in marketing.

 

I do recommend a press release be issued. Simply state the facts and do not worry about the consequences.

 

“Homeless man sues all the lawyers in NYC for failure to deliver his trust fund!!!” That would be an interesting headline.

 
 

You must remember, I literally do have a patent application that cleans up oceans. I have studied physics and chemistry and CAN talk with ANY phd in those fields at a high-competence level. The approach described in that patent is valid and viable and doable.

 

The end result will be the NYC Bar will be enormously prestigious and lawyers from around the country will join and move to be a part of it.

 

Sincerely,

Andrew Bransford Brown

917 653 7781

 

For supporting evidence of the initial suit, see:

1. promiselanguage.blogspot.com- Public spec for monetary transactions. Solves monetary science.

2. “Trapping Discrete Particles in Fluids” – Cleaning the world’s oceans. One particle at a time.

Current Status as of Monday, September 30th, 2013.

November 3, 2013

Psychologists say there are 4 stages of Grief. In any loss, all human beings go through four stages:

1. Denial

2. Bargaining

3. Acceptance

4. Resolution

Apparently all lawyers in the NYC Bar Association (aka The Association of the Bar of the City of New York. And to be verbose as humanly possible, “bar” also might mean a “drinking establishment”.) are in DENIAL about the verdict.

24,000 lawyers refuse to admit they could be wrong or could have lost or could be guilty or complicit in hiding SLAVE TRADERS!

Yes, all allegations have been proven factual and each of the 24,000 NYC bar members have been found guilty of conveying humans as property inside trust funds.

So, they are guilty and do owe me $4,000 each. When will the first lawyer get over their denial?

PS. I hope they realize that civil guilt CAN be used as evidence of criminal guilt. A judge or prosecutor in West Virginia could convict, sentence, and issue an arrest warrant based on the evidence on this website alone!

QUICK LINKS

November 3, 2013

INITIATING COMPLAINT/LAWSUIT (uncontested so GUILTY as alleged)

http://abbvsnycbar.blogspot.com/2013/09/on-thursday-september-19th-2013-i.html

TYPED COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT

http://abbvsnycbar.blogspot.com/2013/09/i-informed-press-and-have-email-trail.html

THE DAY THE CIVIL TRIAL TURNS CRIMINAL

http://abbvsnycbar.blogspot.com/2013/09/judgement-day.html

LEGAL ANALYSIS (“case has no merit”, “credence to the claim”)

http://abbvsnycbar.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-case-has-no-merit-and-credence-to.html

SUPPORTING NOTES AND NOTICES

http://abbvsnycbar.blogspot.com/2013/09/handwritten-notes-on-initiating-lawsuit.html

Handwritten notes on the initiating lawsuit

November 3, 2013

First page:

Notice given in person at 42 W 44th St at 11am (or 12pm) Friday, Sept. 20th, 2013. Bret Parker introduced himself as managing director of the org. He had a bruised eyeball from a tennis accident.

No response until Monday at 4pm. Alan Rothstein pled “not guilty” and appointed himself the lawyer. I asked him for a list of alternatives and decided the court venue was not sufficient due to court officers being parties to the suit.

9/23/2013 4:30pm

Andrew B Brown (signature)

Back of 3rd page:

A summons was sent via email to Alan Rothstein to discuss venue, representation, and possible judiciary.

At 5:25pm I received an email rejection notice from arothstein@nycbar.org. Apparently his arrogance has resulted in ignoring my argument and lawsuit.

At 12:45pm today (Sept 24, 2013) I delivered notice to the defendant of the verdict of GUILTY with damages of $100 million ($4,000 each defendant (lawyer/member of association) x 25,000 members. Woman accepted notice. Red dress. Middle Eastern or Indian in an Arbitration conference during recess.

Note: phone number and email address are handwritten next to the Plaintiff’s name on the first page.

November 3, 2013

Well, not one lawyer has admitted or acknowledged or done anything but silent treatment me.

As of today each lawyer in NYC owes me $4,320. After some thought last night and this morning:

This civil verdict CAN be used as evidence of GUILT in a criminal proceeding. In fact, if a judge in Corpus Christi or something decided to, they could take a look at the documentation, judgement and initiating lawsuit and write up a conviction for “conspiracy” or “complicit negligence resulting…” and sentence EACH of the 24k members of the bar to 8-10 years in prison. Then issue a warrant for their arrest. Then a marshal can fly up and arrest each and every NYC lawyer and toss them in prison. Sight unseen.

“Are you a member of the NYC bar association?” Yes. Ok, “You’re coming with me.” Handcuffed and hop on the next plane to prison.

How long will it take for a smart judge or prosecutor to figure this out?

THE DAY A CIVIL TRIAL BECAME CRIMINALLY PROSECUTABLE

November 3, 2013

It is Friday the 27th of September 2013 today. The due date for the lawyers to pay me $4,000 each is the end of business today (5pm EST). If they do not settle with me today in person with valid consideration, an 8% late fee penalty will be applied to the principal balance.

 

Also note, since they have been proven GUILTY legally, a smart prosecutor can now bring CRIMINAL charges against them for slave trading and grand theft trust (conveying humans as property within trust funds and hiding it).

November 3, 2013

Andrew Bransford Brown VS. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

 

Essentially ALL lawyers in NYC have been found GUILTY of trust fund theft and conveying human beings as property as part of the trusts.

 

I have been trying to post most of the relevant information here:

http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=278443

 

Analysis here:

http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=278478

“the case has no merit” and (“credence to the claim” or “recognition of the claim”)

November 3, 2013

When a lawyer says “the case has no merit” in response to defending a lawsuit where he is the Defendant, in essence that means he/she has a legal opinion and that is his judgement. That does not mean he is correct. A defendant cannot be his own judge.

 

When a lawyer says he/she does not want to give “credence to the claim” in defensive of a lawsuit, it means he/she is “pleading the fifth” amendment and does not want to incriminate themselves.

 

The first is an appeal to his/her authority as the expert. The second is the common use of “pleading the 5th” and not wanting to say anything that can be used against him/her. This could be due to guilt OR not knowing how to respond to the assertion or allegation. If that occurs, simply ask for a moment to confer or more time if research is required.

 

A 30 day continuance is ridiculous if it is simply a 5 minute iPhone lookup to reference some law text. But that is a separate subject.

 

Talking or responding to the claimant or plaintiff with the grievance is usually NOT giving “credence to the claim”.

 

To cite a recent precedent, in the case between Andrew Bransford Brown vs. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York, both uses of the above were essentially “pleading the 5th” to avoid a GUILTY verdict or a CONSPIRACY TO hide the GUILTY. It was NOT due to a lack of legal knowledge or the need to consult. It was a refusal to accept the possibility of General Counsel’s possibility he was wrong.

 

In the above mentioned case, a summons was issued over email after in-person notice was given. The summons was to schedule a meeting to discuss where the next meeting was to occur. This initial meeting was simply to locate a representative agreeable to both parties, a venue agreeable to both parties, and the possible need for a judge that was agreeable to both parties. In the Plaintiff’s assertions, the venue selected by the Defendant was filled with Defendants. The judge(s) selected by the Defendant were all Defendants themselves (or at a minimum were in the same “club” as the Defendant).

 

So, in the Defendant’s failure to appear to the summons, the Plaintiff was forced to be his own acting judge. That was the reason behind the Judge’s very conservative ruling.

TYPED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT

November 3, 2013

I informed the press and have an email trail that is long and includes notifications to Hawaii, Texas, and DC bar associations as well as major media outlets including the WSJ, CNN, local NY news, amongst others.

I think I will post the judgement and ignore the arguments and discussion of the case for now. The following was delivered to 42 W 44th Street and handed to a woman in a red dress, I think, who was Middle Eastern or Indian in descent. She was in recess from an arbitration meeting to the right inside the front door. Several people were talking and she identified herself as a member. I suppose it is reasonably possible she was not a member of the association and was only at the arbitration conference, but this notification was “legally” a nicety and not a necessity.

I did inform MANY of the judgement and posted it publicly and informed standard media and non-standard media and notified hundreds of people around NYC (subways, bars, restaurants, street corners, parks, etc.)

To date, I have not received any notice (email, phone, text, or in person) of a libel suit or anything other than silent treatment. Apparently they are in psychological “denial”. As a good psychologist might say, in any loss there are 4 stages of Grief, the first is denial, then bargaining, then something, then acceptance. Apparently all 24,000 lawyers in NYC are in denial.

Handwritten note to be delivered to 42 W 44th Street this afternoon by me, Andrew Bransford Brown:

9/24/2013

RE: Andrew Bransford Brown vs. The Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

To Whom it May Concern:

I, Andrew Bransford Brown, have determined the following:

1. the lawyers refuse to defend themselves.
2. they must be guilty or protecting the guilty (or they would counter with libel or slander).
3. The verdict is GUILTY (acting Judge is me due to “no contest” in negotiations).
4. SENTENCE/DAMAGES are $4,000.00 each. All licensed lawyers. Students excepted.
5. I am open to settlement of lesser amounts if aggregated or preventing me from the hassle of filing a lien on personal property or real estate.
6. I hereby request a membership roster in both digital & paper format to assist in collections. Failure to comply with this request may result in additional collection fees on top of the $4,000.00 each. Email addresses, names, and physical addresses at a minimum. Phone #’s also.

The pain and suffering of filing 25,000 liens might be substantial.

Andrew Bransford Brown

Opening discussions with the Bar association

November 3, 2013

Sent on Friday, September 20th, 2013 to all the managing staff at the NYC bar association (including the President, Director, Counsel, and all other publicly posted email addresses on their website.):

As this suit does apply to both The Association of the Bar of the City of New York and all its members, I wanted to make sure you had a digital copy to distribute to all your 24,000 members.

 

It is much easier than making 24,000 copies and mailing them individually.

 

FYI, I gave legal notice of this suit to Alan Rosenstein last night over the phone, Bret Parker this morning in person at 42 W 44th Street in the main lobby, and filed some paperwork at the New York County Courthouse at 60 Centre Street this afternoon.

 

I am currently in the process of informing the press, so issuing a statement from your side of the suit might be a good idea. Might I suggest allowing me a $1,500 stipend from your petty cash fund while we iron this suit out, would be very well-received publicly. Forcing me into a homeless shelter eating in a soup kitchen while you have nice cocktails and dinner tonight discussing the case is not the best image to present to the public.

 

Sincerely,

Andrew Bransford Brown

917 653 7781

andrewbb@gmail.com

INITIATING COMPLAINT (uncontested, so GUILTY as alleged)

November 3, 2013

On Thursday, September 19th, 2013, I Andrew Bransford Brown, called the NYC bar association and spoke with General Counsel Alan Rothstein, informing him of my intention to sue the organization and all associated lawyers.

On Friday morning, I composed and filed a lawsuit against all the lawyers in NYC. Please see attached initiating lawsuit.

I notified someone in the office of the suit, then printed it and walked it to 42 W 44th Street. There I went to the door man/security person who called upstairs. A woman on the phone appeared quite distraught and did not know what to do. I calmly stated that I was there to notify them of a lawsuit. Apparently lawyers default response is that if they do not accept notice of the lawsuit, then the lawsuit doesn’t exist!

Anyhow, I met someone who said he was the Managing Director of the association. I later learned his name was Bret Parker, but cannot categorically prove that assertion. Whoever it was, asserted himself as the Managing Director of the bar association. I am sorry for the “letter of the law” type of people who want a badge, ID, verification to the capitalization of the association, etc., but that was more than sufficient for me to hand him a copy of the initiating lawsuit. He had a tennis accident and a bruised eyeball; I know how that feels. Anyhow, he made two copies and kept one for himself. We were at the front area the whole time. I left saying that I think that I probably won’t have ANY problem with most of the lawyers in this association so I hope we can handle this amicably. That is not verbatim, but pretty close. Bret Parker was nonchalant about it also.

See below for a copy of the initiating lawsuit:

Supreme Court, Civil Branch,New YorkCounty

New YorkCountyCourthouse

60 Centre Street

New York,N.Y.10007

 

Andrew Bransford Brown, an individual,

 

Plaintiff

 

vs.

 

The Association of the Bar of the City ofNew York,

(unknown legal structure,

perhaps contractual organized withinNew York City)

 

Defendant

 
 

Plaintiff, Andrew Bransford Brown, allege as follows:

 

On or about January 25, 1967 I had a trust fund whose custody was assumed by the legal organizational structure in theUnited States of Americato include the Federal Government and all legal professionals in practice at that time. It is unknown whose custody it was placed under, however, a legal professional or professionals must have known of its existence and paperwork is hidden or buried (or destroyed) to prevent me from discovering its existence.

 

Since the time of my birth (January 25, 1967), in my search for my natural parents I discovered extraordinary circumstantial evidence that can be explained in no other way than one or more lawyers formed a conspiracy and failed to deliver paperwork informing me of my trust fund on or about my 18thbirthday.

 

Background on Trust funds: Large, old-wealth trust funds frequently included arranged marriages or brides. While some see the monetary value in stealing the trust, others see the opportunity to avail themselves to the 100,000,000 women who were in my trust fund.

 

I assert the legal community at large was coerced or tempted into the rights of first perusal of those women which grew so large as to include the Federal Government and military. Some background understanding,HiroshimaandNagasakiduring WWII were bombed with nuclear weapons to threaten Japanese royalty into delivering their princesses according to trust funds that probably led to the trust fund in my father’s name. Those princesses were delivered to military personnel in theUnited Statesand never reached my father.

 

In my research, I located my natural mother, Kay Hudson Fiset (Hudsonmaiden name) inSyracuse,NY. Her father was Keith Hudson (Thousand Oaks,Californiaresident). She and his Japanese wife were co-trustees on his estate. It was put into probate and I have not seen the documents. He died at the age of 97 or 98 about 2 years ago. My estimation is that trust will provide clues to my paternal trust.

 

As the de-facto bar association of the City of New York, the Defendant has a fiduciary obligation to the public at large to maintain ethics and standards of its members. It is my estimation that one or more lawyers in said association have factual knowledge of some or all of the above.

 
 

Parties

 

Andrew Bransford Brown, an individual born in Honolulu, Hawaii on January 25, 1967 and currently residing at 1218 Hoe Avenue #331, Bronx, NY 10459 (a homeless shelter). Andrew was adopted at 6 days old by Colonel Joseph Brown III (MD) and his blind wife Suzanne Hoskins Brown of Charlottesville, VA (currently residing in Atlanta, GA). Apparent natural mother is Kay Hudson Fiset of Charlottesville, VA (currently residing in Syracuse, NY). Note: it is possible Kay Hudson Fiset was a surrogate in an ovum donation. My intuition and experience indicates either a Ford or Hilton was the ovum donor in 1966, however, I have no tangible proof of that. (Plaintiff)

 

The Association of the Bar of the City of New York, a voluntary association of lawyers and students with unknown legal structure, apparently organized under the laws of New York City. The association headquarters is located at 42 West 44th Street, New York, NY 10036. (Defendant)

 
 
 

Factual Background

 

My current situation is I have been forced into poverty and am living in a homeless shelter at 1218 Hoe Avenue, Bronx, NY 10459.

 

My assets are $0, my liabilities are <$5,000 in credit card and other debts.

 

My last job was a valet parking attendant at the Marriott in Times Square (Central Parking was the employer). I was fired from that job when I complained about being placed in a dingy garage running dispatch without break and without relief and without allowing time for dinner with no windows and running inventory on their computer for 8+ hours at a time. I also complained the tip pool at the Marriott desk was being raided and I was receiving $5-9 for each 8 hour shift. I was originally hired as a valet attendant who greeted customers and was fine in that job, but they forced me into a garage outside of public view. Note: I am blonde, blue eyes, tall and fit, well groomed and very presentable.

 

Prior to Central Parking, I was working at Genpact (on assignment to Morgan Stanley) as Morgan Stanley’s lead software architect for their wealth management CRM. I designed the architecture and authentication system that I termed “Fingerprint Touch”logon. Essentially it is an identity-theft proof way of authenticating a human being on their phone. I informed senior management of Genpact of the patentability of the technology. After no response, I hand-wrote a description of the technology along with some intellectual property law recommendations and requested a meeting with an IP lawyer and computer security personnel at Morgan Stanley to discuss its viability. At 6am approximately 3 months ago I distributed a copy of that handwritten note to every cubicle and office on the 10th floor at One New York Plaza on Water Street, NY. As all personnel on that floor had the same security clearance and the handwritten note never left the floor, I did not feel this was in any way a security breach. It was simply a memo to the team of my status on the project. I was scolded by Genpact human resources and a day later received a call from the sales guy (not my boss) while he was in London who fired me on the phone. Two days later I was forcibly evicted from my quasi-legal sublet on 42nd street between 9th and 10thavenues. (a very nice concierge-type luxury building.)

 

I have heard through the grapevine, but do not have tangible evidence that my allowance was set to $0 about 6 years ago. Prior to that, my allowance had been $100,000 per year, however, I had to work for that allowance because the thieves who stole my trust fund did not want me to learn of its existence.

 

What can I prove?

 

1. Extreme competence at a world-class level in nearly any field of endeavor or subject-matter to include physics, monetary science, psychology, philosophy, linguistics, mathematics, accounting, and computer science and software development and databases and security.

2. Total income of much less than $100,000 per year despite the above competencies with proof of extraordinary efforts and successes beyond measure.

3. An unexplained “silent treatment” from American females (no dates or conversations or eye contact from girlfriend or marriage-quality females in my 46 years of life).

4. An unexplained “silent treatment” from the Federal government, including the White House, CIA, military branches, Congress, and various Federal offices. I can provide an email and fax trail that is unexplainable to any reasonable person of why there was no response.

5. An unexplained “silent treatment” and attack from the IRS that resulted in a fraudulent tax lien filed in Maricopa County without a property address (I never owned property in Maricopa County, so how can they file a tax lien on potential property ownership?). Further, the tax lien was a result of a fraudulent 1099 where the IRS asserted gross amount as income and refused to consider cost basis of stock purchases, although brokerage statements were provided via fax and certified mail to multiple IRS offices around the country.

 

What do I want?

 

A copy of my trust fund document as a historical document for my family records. As the trust fund has been depleted in its entirety, I would simply like to know what happened.

The personal assets of the lawyers who did this to me and for them to be publicly and civilly stripped of all assets and personal contacts and acquaintances and placed into either a permanent homeless shelter with no cash or assets (food and water only) OR a public physical torture cube, depending on the civil or criminal proof that is discovered.

Due to my extreme poverty I request an expedited proceeding. The soup kitchen food and living amongst homeless is highly debilitating. My formerly nice clothes are taking a toll when following homeless people in the laundry.

I would like to request a small stipend/allowance while the suit is underway so I can afford to do laundry and buy some laundry detergent and I would also like to sit quietly in a bar this weekend and have a beer or two and buy some Backwoods smokes. Perhaps I might be allowed food outside the soup kitchen. An allowance of $1,500/month while the suit is underway is requested. I might also have printing, postage, and recording fees to pay that I cannot afford at this time.

Mirrored from

May 14, 2010

http://keihatsu.blogspot.com
http://keihatsu-inventions.blogspot.com
http://keihatsu-moleculardynamics.blogspot.com
http://traumology.blogspot.com
http://promiselanguage.blogspot.com

Takka Tan Tan

March 23, 2010

Free energy machine

March 23, 2010

Is the cohesive force of water stronger than gravity? Answer: yes (look at water cling to the side of a glass). Therefore, capillary action will pull water uphill.

For an example, look at a tree. A tree is a slow motion fountain.

Or touch the end of a napkin into water and the water crawls up. That’s capillary action. Also note how it filters certain heavier substances. So the design of the napkin (sponge) can extract discrete particles from the fluid.

Edited to add picture on 1/11/2010:

Another design using the same principles (1/27/2010):

Reorganizing science

March 23, 2010

Theoretical Physics

Thermodynamics
—Crystals
—Molecular dynamics (magnets and molecules)
—Chemistry (destroy one thing to create another)

Life science
—Genetics
—Biology (cell growth and divisions, not arbitrary classifications)
—Behavioral science
——Anthropology
——Economics (monetary science)
——Traumology (study and resolution of trauma)

A few basic principles:
1. light is a fluid (shadows are illuminated by eddies of light)
2. gravity is a vacuum (Eg. ferrous iron)
3. magnetism is gravity
4. you can split apart molecules and remove electrons using electromagnetic waves
5. consciousness is a fluid
6. zero is not a number (mathematics is a symbolic representation of reality and not reality itself. IE. largely mental masturbation)
7. E=mc2 shows a valid relationship, but the equation is not correct. The speed of light is not constant and he forgot about time.

The science of Thermodynamics is not a set of laws. That set of laws will be known as “general tendencies of fluids”. Thermodynamics is a new science studying the interaction of fluids (moving particles). Molecular dynamics is a sub-science which replaces “nano-technology”. Chaos theory? Forget about it. That’s a silly way to model stuff in a computer. Represent light as a fluid and you’ll get some more accurate weather prediction.

See below for my patent on “Trapping discrete particles in fluids”.

Life

March 23, 2010

When the sperm enters the ovum it finds food. Interwining the two parent’s DNA strands, building someone entirely new. We’re all parameciums at that point. Sex doesn’t occur until the first cell division. I theorize that 5 stem cells are the first cell divisions. Some of those divisions may be: brain, pineal (or perhaps other similar glands), bone, organs, and nervous system (or perhaps muscle).

So modifying the DNA in the stem cells might work, but would likely create conflict with that original paramecium. I wonder if the original paramecium is contained in the pineal itself. Locked away until emotional trauma is entirely healed.

When do we ever get back to that original paramecium (self)?

Female language patterns

March 23, 2010

Female language is based on the double entendre and is an atrocious use of language that impedes communication. The language stems from early sexual abuse and trauma. The entendre is created through combining the normal definition of the words with a subjective phonetic interpretation that is almost always sexual and usually very ugly. For example, the phrase: “You’ve gotta be kidding”. When women say that phrase, they also mean: “You’ve got two? Dinging the kid” OR “You’ve got TA? Ding the kid”. The latter phrase is a subconscious cry for help and simultaneously reinforces the child molestation they received as a child

Solving adoption trauma

March 23, 2010

Adoption trauma creates feelings of “worthless” and “special” which are frequently perpetuated throughout an adoptee’s life. “Worthless” stems from the mother’s rejection and “specialness” stems from the adoptive family choosing to adopt the child. This creates a lifetime pattern that oscillates between “worthless” and “special” and usually goes unrecognized due to the non-acceptance that adoptees experience great trauma when separated from their natural mother.

Also… very important to female adoptees is the frequent rape that occurs on their newborn day. This is either a penis inserted into the infant’s mouth or a mother who places the infant on her clitoris before breastfeeding (associating sex with food). While this occurs frequently with non-adoptees, it aggravates the adoptive trauma and reinforces the oscillating behavior towards feeling worthless/special. Unless recognized consciously, this will create a repetitive subconscious behavioral pattern that continues through all of life.

Gravity

March 23, 2010

A little over one year ago I figured out how gravity works: Imagine a particle. Now open up the particle and get all the stuff out of it and close it back up. What’s inside? It’s not matter, so it has anti-matter inside with a huge vacuum. That’s gravity on the small scale like a hydrogen atom.

Now, imagine the sun with some iron in it. Iron boils and creates a big bubble of iron. That’s the core of the earth; filled with anti-matter. Iron is a ferous material like a sponge too.

Phonetics and language/symbol manipulation

March 23, 2010

I was driving around checking things out around Lake Tahoe today thinking about language and phonetics and symbols.

north
south

west
east

notice the phonetic similarity. I have a feeling you could structure the “th” and “st” in ways that would describe a physical symbol in other languages. Sun cross comes to mind.

Also, if you notice Thai and Vietnamese… Frequently attractive words in one language are phonetically ugly in the other. For example, the word “pretty” in Vietnamese is “dung” in English. I don’t think that’s random. Who was in charge of assigning Arabic lettering to Vietnamese? Whoever it was deliberately sabotaged it to ensure maximum cultural conflict. Same goes for Thai. I wonder if the languages are more related than everyone realizes. Phonetics.

Corporations

March 23, 2010

Many of the problems we face today can be traced to the anonymity and irresponsibility allowed through corporate entities. By design, corporations have no accountability to those behind the scenes. I’d like to create a new legal entity with full accountability and visibility to the living beings behind them. Forcing them to be accountable. Accountorations? I’ll think about a good name. Once that simple entity is defined, all existing corporations would be dissolved and all corporate law would become obsolete. Those hiding behind the anonymity and non-liability of corporations would have to find another way to make a living (government, wall street, central banking, etc).

If people have no liability for their actions people will tend towards taking excessive risk

Picture of a ghost at my condo in Bangkok

March 23, 2010

Her name is Nong Nok.

Patenting one’s life

March 23, 2010

I asked my patent lawyer about patenting my life. I wonder if that’s possible. Isn’t a patent granted to the first person who has an idea and registers it publicly? Isn’t this blog a public place? So until we have a registration service for patentable ideas, can’t this suffice?

We are a bit undecided about how to go about doing that (where, who, how, etc), so for now, I will unequivocally state that I own the patent on patenting one’s life. Furthermore I patented my entire life and all ideas belong to me. So anyone wishing to build a perpetual energy machine based on my principles must ask me for permission. This applies to ALL my ideas like forming human relationships based on human dynamics (molecular biological principles), or the global monetary system, etc.

Keep in mind I’m one man with rather simple needs, so permission will likely be granted as long as you are using the idea in a beneficial way. That is not tacit approval, however. Formal permission is required.

Perpetual Energy Machine (effectively)

March 23, 2010

Before you jump all over me for asserting the idea of perpetual energy, this is a 4.5 billion year energy machine that I think might also be perpetual. As long as the earth and sun remain intact, this idea will work for sure. So… if we have all arguments out of the way, here is the idea a 10 year old can understand (note it could be a smaller scale, but let’s go big):

I want to pull ocean water up the hill over the continental divide between LA/San Diego and Phoenix. Once it crests the hill, gravity provides more than sufficient energy to power cities, desalinate water, and turn desert into farm land. So… how to get that ocean water over the hill?

First, the wind farm at the top of the hill on I-10 is sufficient. 4.5 billion year energy machine is proven.

BUT. I have a more interesting idea:

I will bet you that the laws of thermodynamics can push water up a hill. If we were to paint the pipe different colors (start with black/white), the pipe and water contained within would expand and contract from the heat of the sun. This creates energy that would push on the body of fluid and with some good engineering, different shaped pipes, intelligently painted sections, and some reservoirs to provide a holding tank, we could push water up the hill just using the heat from the sun expanding water. Wouldn’t be simple, but wouldn’t be all that difficult either.

Solar power using paint and pipe only. I am 100% certain it would work. Once the water is at the top of the hill and over the continental divide? Effectively perpetual energy. Free water. Free energy. For 4.5 billion years.

Trapping particles in moving fluids

March 23, 2010

My patent was filed today (July 22, 2009). The invention is designed to trap individual particles such as atoms, molecules, bacterium, viruses, etc. It targets specific particles and allows the rest to flow by undisturbed. Works for desalination and water mining. It will definitely be useful when nanotechnology gets going and would work on my San Diego->Phoenix->Gulf of Mexico water park idea.

The basic idea is similar to children’s wooden blocks: the child places the shapes in the appropriate hole: circle, square, triangle, star, etc. Since each molecule/particle has a specific shape and responds to electromagnetic frequencies in specific ways, a box can be built to capture specific particles. Simple, but would work without disturbing the other particles in the water/blood/fluid flow

Seceding Arizona from the United States of America

March 23, 2010

I had this idea yesterday that Arizona should secede from the US effective immediately. (This also works for all states, but AZ is well positioned.)

I realize this is a staggering idea to some, but please think for a moment.

Pros: every person would receive an instant 35-45% pay raise. (income taxes, social security/medicare including the employer paid portion).
Cons: we wouldn’t receive highway funding

All that would be required is convincing 90 legislators to do a temporary seccession for 1 year. Within days, people would see the dramatic increase in their paychecks and the legislators would be lauded as heroes; guaranteeing their re-election.

Now, this does leave out the service industry and those who work for tips. Since business owners would be receiving at least that amount as a pay raise too (not paying income taxes, etc.), this would instantly free up capital to allow for generous pay raises for employees who rely on tips. I also recommend posting signs prominently saying something like, “We care about our employees and pay them well. Please do not tip.” Signed, the managers name. Brings a whole new meaning to complimenting the employees and taking suggestions.

Business & military security

March 23, 2010

Hidden Desktop would work as military encryption as well as secure communications between corporations. HD allows the creation of tiered security with full visibility into the back doors. For example, a boss might hold the keys to the employee’s computer and data, but the boss could not access it without going through a formal and fully visible process. That process could be as elaborate as submarine nuclear launch instructions. This implicity communicates trust to the employee and transforms the boss/employee relationship. Imagine the change in management at corporations with the boss not being a policeman on their employees and rather looking at their work product. It also protects intellectual property of the employees and helps prevent others from taking credit for ideas that originated elsewhere. This could get into huge consulting gigs for MBAs. The technical difficulties with the above are trivial. A couple of good programmers and network people (I have some people in mind) and we would have a corporate transformative management system. Plus the military application of the above. I’d like to sell it to all governments and corporations (as well as individuals).
http://www.hiddendesktop.com
(I originated the idea, designed and developed the product, and am beginning to market it. I also want to put it on cameras and cell phones.)

New place for some open chit chat

March 23, 2010

http://elitetrader.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=54

March 23, 2010

Global solution for money

March 23, 2010

Search for keihatsu’s posts on this thread. Describes a global monetary solution that transforms economics and politics:

http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=222321

Edited 1/27/2010:
Looks like they deleted the last 3 pages of that thread. I posted the full solution to the monetary system along with an equation that represents human interactions.

Communication * Performance
_______________________ = Trust
Time

The above equation is not yet complete, but does include the idea of the individual and conscious choice as well as time’s linearity. It describes the interaction of two or more individuals. In reference to money, the equation can be stated as: “Communication of performance over time is trust”. Although trust is not the only solution to the equation. The success or recognition of the individual is defined by the communication of their performance over time.

Looking for names for my son

March 23, 2010

BE FOREWARNED, this thread sounds a bit insane and does require a LOT of filling information to understand. If you can handle more than a little craziness you can read, but do not make assumptions about keihatsu based on these posts.

Link to a thread on another site:

http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=388487


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.